Delta Virtual Airlines Water Cooler | PC Support |
AMD phenom processors |
DVA6102
Captain, B757-200
Joined on July 01 2008
Century Club
"MATH!!!" Pasadena, TX
153 legs, 209.0 hours
10 legs,
15.1 hours online 131 legs,
183.0 hours ACARS 3 legs,
5.0 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 24 2011 13:56 ET by Naren Manoj
|
Would this processor run FSX better: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103923
or this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103849
I appreciate the comments!
Thanks,
DVA6102
|
DVA9818
Captain, B767-300
Joined on May 24 2011
Atlanta, GA
62 legs, 145.4 hours
5 legs,
7.3 hours online 60 legs,
141.4 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
June 24 2011 14:25 ET by Christian Graves
|
Well the first one is a faster cpu out of the box so it would run fsx a little better. Considering they both are black edition you can overclock them and get a heck of a lot better performance out of fsx. Just me personally I would choose the six core cpu, because if you run a lot of background programs with fsx (REX, UT2, Radar Contact, Acars...etc.) it spreads the load out between the cores giving better performance. It's reallly up to you though, always check reviews also.
Christian GravesCaptain, B767-300
|
|
DVA2214
Captain, A330-300
OLP E-MAIL
Joined on March 25 2005
50 State Club
Everett 500 Club
Globetrotter
White Knuckles Club
Million Mile Club
Millennium Club
US Capital Club
DVA Fifteen-Year Anniversary
"One takeoff and landing at a time" Tampa, FL
1,124 legs, 2,777.2 hours
35 legs,
61.3 hours online 1,005 legs,
2,492.2 hours ACARS 1,153 legs, 2,869.7 hours total 111 legs dispatched, 90.7
hours
|
Posted onPost created on
June 24 2011 14:50 ET by Anthony Katosh
|
i have the amd ii x6 2.8 over clocked stable to 3.5 runs fsx an a lot of back ground programs very nicely
|
DVA6102
Captain, B757-200
Joined on July 01 2008
Century Club
"MATH!!!" Pasadena, TX
153 legs, 209.0 hours
10 legs,
15.1 hours online 131 legs,
183.0 hours ACARS 3 legs,
5.0 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 24 2011 17:38 ET by Naren Manoj
|
What FPS do you think I'll get with 8GB 1333 MHZ RAM, the Phenom II x6 1090T, and the Sapphire 5670 ATI card vs 8 GB 1333 MHZ RAM, the Phenom II x4 975, and the Sapphire 5670 ATI card?
Oh, and I have the PMDG 744X, FSX, My Traffic X 5.1, and I would like to go full visual specs on FS.
In the background, I'll probably have three tabs open on Google Chrome, ACARS, and occasionally Calculator and MS Word.
|
DVA9589
First Officer, A320
Joined on March 14 2011
50 State Club
US Coastal Club
Commuter Conquest
Millennium Club
US Mountaineer Club
Globetrotter
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Everett 500 Club
Stuart, IA USA
1,464 legs, 2,331.9 hours
45 legs,
90.3 hours online 1,450 legs,
2,311.2 hours ACARS 4 legs,
8.4 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 24 2011 22:43 ET by Randy Donnelly
|
I run a AMD 970 BE OC'd @ 4.1ghz. CPU temp @ 48c constant, Nvidia 480GTX. 6g 1600 mem. I have my FPS locked at 30 and its stays there most of the time. may drop to 28 using PMDG MD11 and heavy scenery, very little if any stutters. I also have Bujotes FSX tweaks. http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html
IMHO. Go with the 975. Its a great family of CPU's.
Randy DonnellyFirst Officer, A320
|
|
DVA9813
Captain, MD-11
Joined on May 28 2011
Century Club
50 State Club
Globetrotter
Northeastern United States
165 legs, 524.9 hours
21 legs,
69.3 hours online 163 legs,
503.7 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
June 25 2011 11:09 ET by Steve Bogus
|
Randy. where did you put the limiter?
Steve BogusCaptain, MD-11
|
|
DVA9589
First Officer, A320
Joined on March 14 2011
50 State Club
US Coastal Club
Commuter Conquest
Millennium Club
US Mountaineer Club
Globetrotter
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Everett 500 Club
Stuart, IA USA
1,464 legs, 2,331.9 hours
45 legs,
90.3 hours online 1,450 legs,
2,311.2 hours ACARS 4 legs,
8.4 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 27 2011 18:35 ET by Randy Donnelly
|
Steve Bogus wrote:
Randy. where did you put the limiter?
I dont use the external frame limiter. It messes with my multimonitor setup. I just set FSX's frame limit to 30FPS.
Randy DonnellyFirst Officer, A320
|
|
DVA6102
Captain, B757-200
Joined on July 01 2008
Century Club
"MATH!!!" Pasadena, TX
153 legs, 209.0 hours
10 legs,
15.1 hours online 131 legs,
183.0 hours ACARS 3 legs,
5.0 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 29 2011 13:12 ET by Naren Manoj
|
Do you think I'll get better out of the six core with all of my background programs?
|
DVA9181
Captain, B757-200
Joined on November 07 2010
Bellevue, WA USA
81 legs, 386.0 hours
7 legs,
15.3 hours online 81 legs,
386.0 hours ACARS
|
Posted onPost created on
June 29 2011 13:57 ET by Ivaylo Ivanov
|
^Most likely. I recently upgraded to an i5 2500k and have my sliders set pretty high. FSX uses only about 50% of the four cores (not too bad considering I use the QW 757, REX, and the OrbX PNW scenery) and I have plenty of CPU power to do other CPU-intensive tasks while I'm flying.
Ivaylo IvanovCaptain, B757-200
|
|
DVA9589
First Officer, A320
Joined on March 14 2011
50 State Club
US Coastal Club
Commuter Conquest
Millennium Club
US Mountaineer Club
Globetrotter
DVA Ten-Year Anniversary
Everett 500 Club
Stuart, IA USA
1,464 legs, 2,331.9 hours
45 legs,
90.3 hours online 1,450 legs,
2,311.2 hours ACARS 4 legs,
8.4 hours event
|
Posted onPost created on
June 29 2011 13:59 ET by Randy Donnelly
|
Naren Manoj wrote:
Do you think I'll get better out of the six core with all of my background programs?
I run a quad and even it rarely uses all the cores. FS isnt very good at mulithreading and addons will more than likely not use more than one or two cores, depending on how the program was coded. Its a soffisticated thing
Randy DonnellyFirst Officer, A320
|
|